Does the iris represent the same old ground that we keep going over?

If there is a timeline is this part of a bigger model. Given the somato-iridic reflex mapping to be a valid and useful constitutional model and that it includes encoding of temporal characteristics of one's path through time, what about the face, the ears, the head, the hands and palms, the feet, the body overall. Do the reflex maps for these other body parts (besides the iris) all have timelines? What do the maps for interpreting (or treating) localized significance have in common? The topographic correspondence is normally presented as a chart divided into zones labeled with corresponding reflex body component.

The map zones are normally in alignment with the superior zones of the part (iris, hand, foot, head, etc.) referring to the superior zones of the body, and the same for other dimensions. For the dual bilateral parts, each right/left part is given to refer to the same right/left zone of the body.

For the iris, the nasal (medial) halves of the iris would refer to the medially placed parts (e.g. nose, tongue, mouth, bronchus, esophagus, pancreas, small intestine, spine). This pattern is mostly from 1:30 to 4:30 RE, -1:30 to -4:30 LE (the medial quarter sectors). The lateral quarter sectors refer to more laterally placed parts such as ears, shoulders, lungs, arms and hands, etc. The upper (superior) quarter sector refers to the head, and the lower (inferior) quarter sectors refer to the abdominal and lower (closer to earth) body parts.

How does this relate to time scales?

Assigning a 'year of significance' to an aberration of the collarette (or inner pupillary border) is based on a time scale with presumed topological and geometrical properties. If a spot at 6:00 is observed on the collarette, this is taken to signify a specific type of situation. A fiber separation or textural gap indicates a different type of situation.

At issue in the chronobiometric discussion is where the time scales start and stop and which direction they should go. Although unresolved, the conventional scaling is CounterClockWise RE (CW LE) from 12:00 with a 60-year period. According to Dr. Lo Rito, the zero point is advanced a small amount (about 1 degree per week) laterally for later births and shifted in the opposite direction (medially) for early births.

If the chronobiometric significance of a textural or chromatic feature is going to be assigned, how will it coexist with the body and mind iris models?

If a person is to have significant life events at 25 years, will there also be a prevalence of adrenal or kidney difficulties then (or at any other time)?

If the iris shows distinctive features at 45 years, is there a correlated forecast of lung and/or heart difficulties (then or later)?

Return to Miles Research Links